Nutrient Timing for Bodybuilding: Diet Breaks, Refeeds, Meal Frequency & Peri-Workout Nutrition

Nutrient timing is the practice of arranging when you eat protein, carbohydrate and calories around training and across the day, the week and a diet. Used well it can make a plan easier to follow and sessions feel better. It is a small lever next to total food intake, and this guide separates what studies show from what researchers hypothesize and what coaches do in practice.

Quick Answer: Does Nutrient Timing Matter for Bodybuilding?

Yes, but how much nutrient timing matters depends on your goals, training demands, and experience. For most bodybuilders, total calorie intake, adequate protein, and overall diet quality matter considerably more than precisely timed meals. However, strategic nutrient timing can become more useful during demanding training schedules, prolonged fat-loss phases, and bodybuilding contest preparation. The key is knowing when additional precision is worthwhile—and when it isn’t.

The practical summary:

• Studies show that when total daily protein is matched, protein timing around a workout has little or no measurable effect on muscle and strength gains (Schoenfeld et al., 2013; Schoenfeld et al., 2017).
• Researchers hypothesize that spreading protein across the day and eating carbohydrate around long or repeated sessions may help in specific cases. The long-term evidence is small or mixed.
• Coaches do things like scheduled refeeds, diet breaks and peak weeks. Several of these have limited controlled research in physique athletes.

Optional tactics stay optional. You do not need to eat every three hours, train inside an “anabolic window”, or take a refeed to progress.

The Priority Hierarchy and What Nutrient Timing Is

Nutrition priorities stack in a rough order of importance:

1. Energy balance. Total calories relative to your goal (surplus, maintenance or deficit) decide whether you gain or lose weight.
2. Protein. Meta-analysis data suggest muscle gains from protein supplementation level off around 1.6 g per kg of body weight per day, with the upper end of the confidence interval near 2.2 g per kg (Morton et al., 2018).
3. Diet quality. Fiber, micronutrients, fluids and mostly minimally processed foods support health and training.
4. Timing. Meal frequency, protein distribution, carbohydrate placement, and planned changes in calories over weeks.

Adherence runs through all four. A schedule you follow for years beats a better-looking one you abandon in a month.

The International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand on nutrient timing reaches a similar conclusion: total intake comes first, and timing strategies are situational (Kerksick et al., 2017). For details on the first three levels, the macronutrients for bodybuilding guide sets daily targets.

Cheat Meals vs. Refeeds vs. Diet Breaks

These terms are conventions used by coaches, not standardized scientific definitions, so the boundaries vary between sources.

Comparison	Cheat meal	Refeed	Diet break
Typical length	One meal	One to three days	About one to two weeks
Energy intake	Unplanned, often well above maintenance	Roughly maintenance or slightly above	Maintenance
Macronutrient focus	None	Higher carbohydrate, lower fat, protein unchanged	Balanced, protein unchanged
Planned in advance	Often not	Yes	Yes
Evidence status	No controlled trials in lifters that I am aware of	Mostly hypothesis and practice	Some small trials, mixed
Main purpose	Social or psychological relief	Training quality, mood, adherence (hypothesized)	Longer mental and physical rest from dieting

A cheat meal can fit a plan without harm, but the word “cheat” frames food as a moral matter. Many lifters find a pre-planned flexible meal easier to live with than an unplanned binge followed by guilt.

Diet Breaks: What the Research Shows and How to Plan One

What studies show. In the MATADOR trial, men with obesity alternated two weeks of dieting with two weeks at maintenance. Compared with continuous dieting, they lost more fat over the whole study and showed a smaller fall in resting energy expenditure (Byrne et al., 2018). These were not lifters, and the protocol took far longer overall.

In resistance-trained adults, the ICECAP trial found similar fat loss and fat-free mass retention with intermittent and continuous dieting. However, participants taking diet breaks reported less hunger, less desire to eat, and greater dietary satisfaction (Peos et al., 2021). Another randomized trial involving resistance-trained women found no clear differences in body composition or resting metabolic rate, although an eating-behavior measure called disinhibition favored the diet-break approach (Siedler et al., 2023).

A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 randomized trials involving 881 participants found no significant differences in body-composition changes between intermittent dieting with breaks and continuous energy restriction. However, diet breaks showed a modest advantage in preserving resting metabolic rate, with stronger evidence of benefit in participants with overweight or obesity than in resistance-trained individuals (Poon et al., 2025).

What this means in practice. Diet breaks may help some athletes manage hunger, dietary fatigue, and adherence. They may also modestly reduce metabolic adaptation under certain conditions, but they do not eliminate the metabolic effects of fat loss or guarantee better muscle retention. For bodybuilders, especially those preparing for competitions, diet breaks remain an optional strategy rather than a proven requirement.

How to use a diet break. Consider one to two weeks at estimated maintenance calories when prolonged dieting causes substantial fatigue, hunger, or adherence difficulties, or when travel and other life events make continued restriction impractical. There is no need to schedule breaks automatically every few weeks. Maintain adequate protein and resistance training, monitor average body weight, and allow enough time if preparing for a competition. A temporary increase on the scale may reflect additional glycogen, water, and digestive contents rather than equivalent fat gain.

To plan one:

• Raise calories to estimated maintenance and keep protein where it was.
• Keep training as normal, and consider holding volume steady instead of adding sets.
• Choose a start date in advance, so the decision is not made while hungry.
• Track your average weight and gym performance across the break, not single days.

A diet break is a tool for dieters who are tired and struggling, and it does not reset your metabolism.

Refeed Days, with a Conventional vs. Structured Week Example

A structured refeed temporarily increases calorie intake toward estimated maintenance, primarily through additional carbohydrates while maintaining sufficient protein. Refeeds are generally more controlled than cheat days and may be scheduled around demanding training sessions or periods when dieting becomes difficult.

In a seven-week randomized trial involving 27 resistance-trained men and women, Campbell et al. (2020) compared continuous calorie restriction with five deficit days followed by two consecutive carbohydrate-focused refeed days each week. Both groups lost fat, but the refeed group showed better preservation of measured fat-free mass and resting metabolic rate. These findings are promising, but the study was small, and changes in glycogen and body water complicate the interpretation of lean-mass measurements. Refeeds have not been conclusively shown to prevent actual muscle tissue loss or produce superior long-term fat loss.

The most practical reasons to consider a refeed are to support dietary adherence, provide more flexibility, and potentially improve training performance. None of these benefits is guaranteed.

Consider an athlete with an estimated maintenance intake of 2,700 calories per day. The following two approaches produce the same planned weekly calorie deficit but distribute energy differently. The structured refeed approach includes two consecutive maintenance-calorie days, mainly by increasing carbohydrate intake. However, its five lower-calorie days require a larger deficit, which may not be appropriate or comfortable for every athlete. An alternative is to accept a smaller overall weekly deficit rather than compensating fully for the higher-calorie days.

	Conventional week	Structured refeed week
Days 1–5	2,200 kcal/day	2,000 kcal/day
Days 6–7	2,200 kcal/day	2,700 kcal/day
Daily protein	180 g	180 g
Daily carbohydrates, days 1–5	235 g	185 g
Daily carbohydrates, days 6–7	235 g	360 g
Daily fat	60 g	60 g
Weekly total	15,400 kcal	15,400 kcal
Weekly deficit	3,500 kcal	3,500 kcal

Putting the higher days around your hardest training sessions, such as a leg day, is a common coaching practice. A refeed will not break through a plateau by itself, and it does not erase a deficit that was already too small to work. If your weekly average is unchanged, so is your expected fat loss.

Meal Frequency and Intermittent Fasting

Meal frequency. A meta-analysis found no clear effect of meal frequency on weight loss when calories were matched, and few of the trials involved lifters (Schoenfeld et al., 2015). The idea that frequent eating “stokes the metabolism” is not supported, because the energy cost of digestion depends on how much you eat, not how often.

For muscle, the useful point is protein per sitting, covered below. Three to six meals all work if the daily total is hit.

Intermittent fasting. Time-restricted eating limits daily food consumption to a particular eating window. It can help some bodybuilders reduce calorie intake or simplify meal planning, but it does not automatically produce superior fat loss when energy intake is comparable.

In an eight-week trial involving resistance-trained men, Moro et al. (2016) investigated a 16:8 time-restricted eating approach and reported fat loss without a significant reduction in fat-free mass. A separate eight-week trial by Tinsley et al. (2017) used a more restrictive four-hour eating window on four days per week in recreationally active young men performing resistance training. That study reduced energy intake but did not demonstrate clear adverse effects on short-term lean-mass retention or strength improvements.

More recent research provides useful context. A 2026 systematic review and meta-analysis involving eight randomized trials found modest reductions in fat mass with time-restricted eating in resistance-trained individuals, without a significant difference in fat-free mass (Ali et al., 2026). Another 2026 meta-analysis involving 11 studies found broadly similar resistance-training adaptations between intermittent-fasting and comparison groups, although limitations in the available evidence prevent definitive conclusions (Zhang et al., 2026).

Practical application: If time-restricted eating suits your lifestyle, an eating window of approximately eight hours or longer may make it easier to accommodate three protein-containing meals, adequate daily calories, and training after a meal. Shorter windows can make these requirements harder to meet. Reassess the approach if appetite, nutrition adequacy, recovery, or training performance suffers. It is an optional meal-scheduling strategy, not a requirement for muscle growth or fat loss.

Protein Distribution, with a 160-Gram Example

Spreading protein across several meals is a reasonable default, and the evidence is stronger for acute effects than for long-term growth.

• In a 12-hour recovery study, 20 g every three hours produced a higher myofibrillar protein synthesis response than 10 g eight times or 40 g twice (Areta et al., 2013).
• In a small crossover study, an even distribution of protein across three meals produced higher 24-hour muscle protein synthesis than a skewed distribution with most protein at dinner (Mamerow et al., 2014).
• A later study found that a very large dose of 100 g of protein kept muscle protein synthesis elevated for at least 12 hours, with no clear ceiling on the response (Trommelen et al., 2023).

These are acute measurements. A short-term rise in muscle protein synthesis does not prove long-term hypertrophy, and the 100 g study does not show that all the protein became muscle. A review concluded that about 0.4 g per kg per meal across at least four meals is a reasonable target but that definitive long-term data are lacking (Schoenfeld and Aragon, 2018).

For a lifter of roughly 100 kg (220 lb), 160 g of protein is about 1.6 g per kg. Three ways to divide it:

• Four meals: 40 g each, a good fit for most people.
• Three meals: about 53 g each, which works fine if you eat large portions.
• Five meals: 32 g each, useful for smaller appetites.

A very lopsided split, such as 20 g, 20 g and 120 g, is not necessarily harmful, but it moves away from the pattern with the most support. Bedtime protein is another popular tactic. Evidence from a 12-week trial in young men suggests casein before sleep may add to gains during training, but it is a single line of research (Snijders et al., 2015).

Peri-Workout Nutrition: Before, After, Intra-Workout and Mouth Rinsing

Before training. When practical, consume a meal containing protein and carbohydrates before resistance training. Allow enough time for comfortable digestion; approximately one to three hours is a useful starting range, depending on meal size, food composition, and individual tolerance. A smaller snack or liquid feeding may be more comfortable closer to training.

Carbohydrates are particularly useful to consider before long, high-volume, or metabolically demanding sessions. In a 2022 systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 studies involving 226 participants, King et al. reported improvements in resistance-training volume from carbohydrate ingestion, especially during sessions lasting longer than 45 minutes and after fasting for at least eight hours. Benefits were also associated with performing more demanding sets, but larger carbohydrate doses did not consistently produce greater improvements.

For a shorter workout performed after normal meals, extra pre-workout carbohydrates may provide little additional benefit. If training early in the morning after an overnight fast, an optional light feeding containing approximately 15–30 grams each of protein and carbohydrate may be convenient. If food before training is uncomfortable, prioritize adequate daily intake and consume protein after the session.

After training. The idea that muscle growth depends on consuming protein within an exact 30-minute anabolic window is overstated. Adequate daily protein and sensible distribution throughout the day are more important than rigid post-workout deadlines. If you ate a protein-containing meal before training, a normal meal afterward will generally be sufficient. If you trained after a prolonged overnight fast, consuming protein reasonably soon afterward is a sensible choice.

Post-workout carbohydrates. Carbohydrate intake helps restore muscle glycogen, but immediately consuming carbohydrates after a typical bodybuilding workout is not mandatory when overall intake is sufficient and recovery time is adequate. Timing becomes more relevant when completing multiple exhaustive sessions in one day, training the same muscle groups again relatively soon, or combining resistance training with demanding conditioning or sport-specific exercise. In these cases, include carbohydrate-containing meals during the recovery period.

During training. Most ordinary bodybuilding sessions do not require a carbohydrate drink. However, pre- or intra-workout carbohydrates may help preserve training volume during particularly long or demanding sessions, especially when training fasted or with limited carbohydrate availability. Whether they are worthwhile depends on the athlete’s training demands, nutrition, and individual response.

Carbohydrate mouth rinsing. Swishing a carbohydrate-containing drink in the mouth and then spitting it out has been studied as a potential performance strategy. A systematic review and meta-analysis by Oliveira-Silva et al. (2023) found a small improvement in muscular endurance but no significant benefit for maximal strength. A possible practical approach involves rinsing for approximately 5–10 seconds around the beginning and midpoint of a demanding workout. Effects are modest and context-dependent, and this technique does not replace adequate fueling. It is optional rather than a standard requirement for bodybuilders.

Nutrient Timing by Bodybuilding Phase

Phase	Timing priorities	Evidence status
Off-season or bulk	Hit calorie and protein targets daily; spread protein over three to five meals; carbs before and after training if they help performance	Distribution: acute data, limited long-term. Carbs around training: practice
Cutting or contest prep	Keep protein high and evenly spread; consider planned refeeds or diet breaks if fatigue builds; place more carbs near hard sessions	Diet breaks: small trials. Refeeds: mostly hypothesis (Helms et al., 2014)
Peak week and show day	Carbohydrate, sodium and water manipulations, aimed at appearance rather than muscle growth	Little controlled research in bodybuilders; mostly coaching practice
Post-show and maintenance	Return to maintenance calories with structure, spread meals, keep training	Coaching practice; the rebound period is a recognized risk for disordered eating

How experience and competition goals change the approach. A newer bodybuilder may only need consistent daily calories, sufficient protein, and a meal schedule that fits training. More experienced bodybuilders performing higher training volumes may benefit from greater attention to carbohydrate availability and meal placement. During contest preparation, nutrient timing can also become a tool for managing dietary fatigue, training performance, and adherence as energy intake decreases. These strategies should be individualized according to the athlete’s needs, recovery, conditioning, and competition timeline rather than applied as rigid rules.

Planning Framework and Three Full-Day Examples

Work through these in order and stop as soon as the plan is workable:

1. Set calories and protein. The macronutrients for bodybuilding guide covers targets.
2. Pick a meal pattern you can repeat. Three to five meals, or an eating window if you like fasting.
3. Place your biggest meals around training. This is for comfort and performance.
4. Add optional tactics only if a specific problem calls for them. Examples: a diet break for deep fatigue, a refeed to improve training on a long cut.

Meal prep can help a schedule stick, and a beginner meal prep guide is on this site.

Each example below totals 160 g protein:

• Four meals, evening lifting at 6 pm: 8:00 breakfast, 40 g; 12:30 lunch, 40 g; 4:00 pre-workout meal, 40 g with carbs; 8:30 post-workout dinner, 40 g.
• Three meals plus a pre-workout snack, morning lifting at 6:30 am: small pre-workout snack of yogurt and fruit, 20 g; 8:30 post-workout breakfast, 50 g; 1:00 lunch, 45 g; 7:00 dinner, 45 g.
• Eating window from noon to 8 pm, lifting at 4 pm: 12:00 meal, 40 g; 3:00 pre-workout meal, 40 g; 6:30 post-workout meal, 45 g; 8:00 final meal, 35 g.

All three can work. The best one is the one you can repeat on a normal week.

Common Nutrient-Timing Mistakes

• Optimizing timing while daily calories or protein are off target.
• Treating a short-term protein synthesis result as proof of long-term muscle growth.
• Reading a post-refeed scale jump as fat gain, or a post-carb-load look as muscle. Glycogen holds water, commonly cited at about 3 g per gram (Olsson and Saltin, 1970), and neither is tissue growth.
• Using a refeed as an excuse for a binge that erases the weekly deficit.
• Taking a diet break after only a few days of dieting.
• Forcing a schedule, such as six meals a day, that does not fit your life.
• Assuming a diet break or refeed will “reset” your metabolism.

Safety Note: Low Energy Availability and Disordered Eating

Low energy availability means that after training, your body has too little energy left for normal function. The IOC consensus statement on Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs) links it to hormonal, bone, immune and mental-health problems, and it affects men and women (Mountjoy et al., 2018; Mountjoy et al., 2023).

Warning signs include missed or irregular periods, low libido, persistent fatigue, recurring injuries or illness, poor sleep, feeling cold and mood changes. Physique sport carries extra risk because contest prep often involves extended deficits, and strict rules or food fears can develop.

Diet breaks and refeeds are not treatments for REDs. If you notice these signs, or if food rules cause distress, guilt or binge-restrict cycles, speak to a doctor, a registered dietitian or a mental-health professional. Our energy balance guide covers REDs in more detail.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is there an anabolic window after training? Probably a wide one. When total protein is matched, eating just before or just after training produced similar results (Schoenfeld et al., 2017).

Do I need to eat every three hours? No. Meal frequency did not affect fat loss in matched-calorie comparisons (Schoenfeld et al., 2015). Hitting your protein total across several meals matters more.

Will a refeed fix a plateau? Not on its own. If weekly calories are the same, so is the expected fat loss. A refeed might help training quality or mood, which is hypothetical.

Is intermittent fasting good for muscle? It can work, but the trials are small and do not show an advantage over eating normally. It suits some lifters’ schedules.

Do I need a diet break? Not always. Consider one after a long diet if hunger, fatigue or training performance are suffering.

Conclusion: What to Do This Week

Pick one schedule. Decide how many meals you will eat, roughly when you will train and eat around it, and how you will reach your daily protein. Run it for a few weeks before changing anything.

Use the planning framework above to set one simple, sustainable schedule this week, then read the linked Lift & Nurture protein and macronutrient guide to set your daily targets.

References and How This Guide Was Researched

This guide draws on peer-reviewed research, including randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Where relevant, the discussion distinguishes direct study findings from proposed mechanisms and practical coaching recommendations. The references below provide access to the original research so readers can examine the evidence and its limitations. The article’s explanatory tables and examples are educational presentations of the evidence, not reproductions of published research figures.

• Aragon AA, Schoenfeld BJ. Nutrient timing revisited: is there a post-exercise anabolic window? J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2013;10:5.
• Areta JL, et al. Timing and distribution of protein ingestion during prolonged recovery from resistance exercise alters myofibrillar protein synthesis. J Physiol. 2013;591:2319-2331.
• Burke LM, et al. Carbohydrates for training and competition. J Sports Sci. 2011;29(Suppl 1):S17-S27.
• Byrne NM, et al. Intermittent energy restriction improves weight loss efficiency in obese men: the MATADOR study. Int J Obes. 2018;42:129-138.
• Campbell BI, et al. Intermittent energy restriction attenuates the loss of fat free mass in resistance trained individuals. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2020;5:19.
• Carter JM, Jeukendrup AE, Jones DA. The effect of carbohydrate mouth rinse on 1-h cycle time trial performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:2107-2111.
• Helms ER, Aragon AA, Fitschen PJ. Evidence-based recommendations for natural bodybuilding contest preparation: nutrition and supplementation. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2014;11:20.
• Kerksick CM, et al. International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: nutrient timing. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2017;14:33.
• Mamerow MM, et al. Dietary protein distribution positively influences 24-h muscle protein synthesis in healthy adults. J Nutr. 2014;144:876-880.
• Moro T, et al. Effects of eight weeks of time-restricted feeding (16/8) on basal metabolism, maximal strength, body composition, inflammation, and cardiovascular risk factors in resistance-trained males. J Transl Med. 2016;14:290.
• Morton RW, et al. A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training-induced gains in muscle mass and strength in healthy adults. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52:376-384.
• Mountjoy M, et al. IOC consensus statement on relative energy deficiency in sport (RED-S): 2018 update. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52:687-697.
• Mountjoy M, et al. 2023 International Olympic Committee’s consensus statement on Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs). Br J Sports Med. 2023;57:1073-1097.
• Olsson KE, Saltin B. Variation in total body water with muscle glycogen changes in man. Acta Physiol Scand. 1970;80:11-18.
• Peos JJ, et al. Continuous versus Intermittent Dieting for Fat Loss and Fat-Free Mass Retention in Resistance-trained Adults: The ICECAP Trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021;53(8):1685–1698.
• Schoenfeld BJ, Aragon AA. How much protein can the body use in a single meal for muscle-building? J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2018;15:10.
• Schoenfeld BJ, Aragon AA, Krieger JW. The effect of protein timing on muscle strength and hypertrophy: a meta-analysis. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2013;10:53.
• Schoenfeld BJ, Aragon AA, Krieger JW. Effects of meal frequency on weight loss and body composition: a meta-analysis. Nutr Rev. 2015;73:69-82.
• Schoenfeld BJ, et al. Pre- versus post-exercise protein intake has similar effects on muscular adaptations. PeerJ. 2017;5:e2825.
• Snijders T, et al. Protein ingestion before sleep increases muscle mass and strength gains during prolonged resistance-type exercise training in healthy young men. J Nutr. 2015;145:1178-1184.
• Tinsley GM, et al. Time-restricted feeding in young men performing resistance training: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Sport Sci. 2017;17:200-207.
• Trexler ET, Smith-Ryan AE, Norton LE. Metabolic adaptation to weight loss: implications for the athlete. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2014;11:7.
• Trommelen J, et al. The anabolic response to protein ingestion during recovery from exercise has no upper limit in magnitude and duration in vivo in humans. Cell Rep Med. 2023;4:101324.
• Poon ET, Tsang JH, Sun F, Zheng C, Wong SH. Effects of intermittent dieting with break periods on body composition and metabolic adaptation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Rev. 2025 Jan 1;83(1):59-71. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuad168. Erratum in: Nutr Rev. 2025 Jan 1;83(1):200. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuae018. PMID: 38193357.
• Siedler MR, Lewis MH, Trexler ET, Lamadrid P, Waddell BJ, Bishop SF, SanFilippo G, Callahan K, Mathas D, Mastrofini GF, Henselmans M, Vårvik FT, Campbell BI. The Effects of Intermittent Diet Breaks during 25% Energy Restriction on Body Composition and Resting Metabolic Rate in Resistance-Trained Females: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Hum Kinet. 2023 Jan 20;86:117-132. doi: 10.5114/jhk/159960. PMID: 37181269; PMCID: PMC10170537.
• Ali AM, Messenburger GP, Neves Collares LD, Nuñez FF, Pieniz S. Time-restricted eating shows a modest reduction in fat mass in resistance-trained individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Res. 2026 Mar;147:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2026.01.001. Epub 2026 Jan 4. PMID: 41687432.
• Zhang M, Wang S, Wutichat S, Tanphanich T, Li H, Zhang X. Effects of intermittent fasting combined with resistance training on training adaptations: an exploratory multilevel meta-analysis. Front Nutr. 2026 Jun 24;13:1879031. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2026.1879031. PMID: 42421917; PMCID: PMC13341873.
• King A, Helms E, Zinn C, Jukic I. The Ergogenic Effects of Acute Carbohydrate Feeding on Resistance Exercise Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2022 Nov;52(11):2691-2712. doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01716-w. Epub 2022 Jul 9. PMID: 35809162; PMCID: PMC9584980.
• Rodrigues Oliveira-Silva IG, Dos Santos MPP, Learsi da Silva Santos Alves SK, Lima-Silva AE, Araujo GG, Ataide-Silva T. Effect of carbohydrate mouth rinse on muscle strength and muscular endurance: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2023;63(27):8796-8807. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2057417. Epub 2022 Apr 4. PMID: 35373671.